🕊️
Deal With Grief Editorial Team
Published · Updated
💛

If you're in crisis, please call or text 988. You deserve support right now — not just information.

Almost everyone has heard of the five stages of grief: denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and acceptance. They appear in textbooks, TV shows, and countless well-meaning conversations with people who are trying to help. But despite their fame, the stages are one of the most misunderstood models in popular psychology — and grief and depression are often conflated alongside them.

Here's what most people don't realize: the stages were never meant to be a rigid roadmap. They were never supposed to happen in order. And "acceptance" doesn't mean what most people think it means.

Understanding what the stages actually are — and what they aren't — can genuinely change how you experience your own grief, and how you support others through theirs.

Where Did the 5 Stages Come From?

The five stages of grief were introduced by Swiss-American psychiatrist Elisabeth Kübler-Ross in her 1969 book On Death and Dying. Kübler-Ross was working with terminally ill patients — not with people who had already experienced a loss, but with people facing their own death. She interviewed hundreds of patients and identified patterns in how people responded to terminal diagnoses.

Her model was groundbreaking at the time. Before her work, death and dying were barely discussed in clinical settings. She gave language to experiences that people were having but couldn't articulate.

"The most beautiful people we have known are those who have known defeat, known suffering, known struggle, known loss, and have found their way out of the depths." — Elisabeth Kübler-Ross

In later years, Kübler-Ross herself clarified that the stages were not meant to be a neat, linear process. In her 2004 book On Grief and Grieving, co-written with David Kessler, she emphasized that people move between stages fluidly, skip some entirely, and return to earlier stages unexpectedly.

The Five Stages — What Each One Really Means

1. Denial

Denial is often the first response to devastating news, and it serves an important purpose: it buffers the immediate shock. When we hear that someone we love has died, or received a terminal diagnosis, the mind often struggles to absorb the reality all at once. Denial is the psyche's way of slowing down the intake of a truth too large to process immediately.

Denial doesn't mean you literally don't believe the person is gone. It can be subtler — continuing to set a place at the table, reaching for your phone to call them, or feeling like you're living in a strange dream. These responses are not denial in the clinical sense; they are the natural lag between knowing something and feeling it.

As denial fades, the feelings it was protecting you from begin to surface. This is painful, but it is also a sign of healing beginning.

2. Anger

Anger is often the most misunderstood stage. People feel guilty about it — especially when the anger is directed at the person who died, at doctors, at God, at themselves, or at people who still have what they've lost.

This anger is completely normal and healthy. It is not a character flaw. Grief counselors often describe anger as an anchor — it's something real and solid to feel when everything else has become formless and incomprehensible. Anger has structure. It has direction. In the absence of control over what has happened, anger is a form of protest.

Allowing yourself to feel angry — rather than suppressing it — is often one of the most important things you can do in grief. Unexpressed anger has a way of turning inward, contributing to depression and prolonged suffering.

3. Bargaining

Bargaining often takes the form of "what if" and "if only" thoughts. What if we had caught it earlier? If only I had called that day. What if I had been there? These thoughts are an attempt to regain control over something fundamentally uncontrollable.

In a religious or spiritual context, bargaining may involve making deals with God or the universe — promises made in exchange for a different outcome. When that bargaining fails (as it must), it can deepen the pain. But the bargaining stage also reflects something beautiful: the depth of love behind it. We bargain because we would do anything to undo the loss.

Many people also experience guilt alongside bargaining. It is worth saying clearly: grief-related guilt is almost always disproportionate to any actual culpability. We did not cause most of what we blame ourselves for.

4. Depression

Depression in the context of grief is not a disorder — it is a natural and appropriate response to profound loss. When the fog of denial has lifted, when anger has been felt, when bargaining has run its course, what remains is the full weight of what has happened.

This sadness can feel bottomless. You may withdraw from life, lose interest in things you used to enjoy, struggle to eat or sleep or function. You may cry constantly — or find that you cannot cry at all, which can feel disorienting.

This stage is important to move through, not around. Suppressing grief-related depression with busyness or substances delays, rather than resolves, the healing process.

💬

Professional support can help you through this stage

If the depression of grief feels unbearable or prolonged, working with a grief-informed therapist can make a genuine difference. See our guide to online therapy for grief →

5. Acceptance

Of all the stages, acceptance is the most misunderstood. Many people hear "acceptance" and recoil — it sounds like being okay with what happened, as if you are agreeing that losing someone you love was fine.

That is not what acceptance means.

Acceptance in Kübler-Ross's model means acknowledging the reality of the loss — not approving of it. It means finding a way to carry your grief rather than being crushed by it. It means learning to live alongside the absence of the person you lost, not pretending the absence doesn't exist.

Acceptance doesn't arrive all at once. It comes in moments — small openings where you feel the possibility of continuing, even carrying this weight. It is not a destination but a gradual orientation toward life.

The Biggest Misconceptions About the 5 Stages

Misconception 1: The stages happen in order. They don't. You might feel anger before denial, or cycle back to bargaining years later. Grief is not linear and does not follow a timetable.

Misconception 2: You have to experience all five stages. Some people experience only two or three stages clearly. Others feel them all. There is no "correct" grief.

Misconception 3: Once you reach acceptance, you're done. Grief doesn't end at acceptance. Waves of grief can return on anniversaries, birthdays, or unexpectedly — years after a loss. This is normal and does not mean you are failing at grief.

Misconception 4: If you're not in one of the five stages, something is wrong. People experience grief in many ways not captured by this model — including relief, numbness, confusion, physical symptoms, and spiritual questioning. All of these are valid.

Other Grief Models Worth Knowing

The five stages are the most famous model of grief, but they are not the only one — and for many bereaved people, other frameworks describe their experience more accurately.

The Dual Process Model (Stroebe & Schut, 1999) — rather than linear stages, this model proposes that grief involves oscillation between two orientations: loss-orientation (focusing on the loss, the grief, the person who died) and restoration-orientation (attending to life tasks, making adjustments, sometimes even finding moments of relief or joy). Healthy grieving involves moving back and forth between these — not staying in either. This explains why you can cry in the morning and laugh in the afternoon, and why neither state cancels the other out. Read more about why grief comes in waves.

The Tasks of Mourning (William Worden) — Worden proposed four tasks that bereaved people need to accomplish rather than stages to pass through: accepting the reality of the loss; experiencing the pain of grief; adjusting to an environment without the deceased; and finding a way to maintain a connection with the deceased while embarking on a new life. The task framework is intentionally active — it suggests that grieving involves work, not just waiting.

Continuing Bonds Theory — challenges the older idea that "completing" grief means detaching from the person who died. Research by Klass, Silverman, and Nickman showed that bereaved people often maintain ongoing connections with the deceased — through memory, ritual, values inherited, and ongoing inner conversations. This is not pathological. It is part of how many people carry their grief healthily forward.

The Sixth Stage: Finding Meaning — David Kessler, who co-wrote On Grief and Grieving with Kübler-Ross, later proposed a sixth stage based on both his clinical work and his own experience of losing a son: finding meaning. This doesn't mean believing everything happens for a reason — it means actively constructing meaning from the experience of loss, which research suggests is associated with better long-term outcomes. Many bereaved people find meaning through advocacy, creative work, new relationships, or simply the deepened appreciation of life that can emerge from loss.

What If You Feel Stuck in a Stage?

Many people worry that they are stuck — perpetually in anger, or permanently in bargaining, or unable to move toward anything that resembles acceptance. This fear is usually more frightening than it needs to be, but it is also worth taking seriously.

Most of the time, feeling "stuck" reflects the fact that grief isn't a smooth progression. You may return to earlier emotional territory many times, especially after triggers — anniversaries, sensory reminders, major life transitions. This is not being stuck. It is the natural non-linearity of grief.

However, if you genuinely feel that your grief has not moved — that you are as acutely distressed now as you were in the first weeks, that you cannot engage with life, that you are actively avoiding anything that reminds you of the loss — this may be a sign of complicated grief (prolonged grief disorder), which affects roughly 10–15% of bereaved people and responds well to specialized treatment. Complicated Grief Treatment (CGT) is an evidence-based therapy that specifically targets the cognitive and behavioral patterns that keep grief from progressing toward integration.

The question to ask yourself is not "which stage am I in?" but "is my grief changing over time, even slowly?" If the answer is genuinely no — if the last six months have been identical to the first six months — that is worth discussing with a grief-informed therapist. It doesn't mean something is wrong with you. It means you need a different kind of support.

What Actually Helps

Knowing the stages of grief intellectually is useful, but it doesn't replace the actual work of grieving. Here are things that genuinely help:

Further Resources

If you want to go deeper into understanding grief, these resources are some of the best available:

📚

On Grief and Grieving — Elisabeth Kübler-Ross & David Kessler

The direct follow-up to the original stages model, written with tremendous compassion and clarity. One of the most recommended books in the grief space.

See all recommended books →

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical or psychological advice. If you are struggling, please reach out to a qualified mental health professional.